Dust or Orbs
Posted 26 June 2006 - 12:12 AM
I have always seen these "things" in photos and for the most part the lens has been dirty or the photo taken in a dusty area.
But when you know the lens is clean and there is no dust or anything how do you tell the difference between an Orb or Dust.
This picture for example.
Oops posted the wrong pic and guess I can't edit my first post here.
This is the pic I was refering to.
Posted 26 June 2006 - 01:43 AM
When I look at this photo I am more drawn towards spirit orbs here. My reason being just the type of photo situation. There seems to be two spirits here that want to be in the photo. In my experience, when you get family occasions or special events, you quite often get passed on family spirits that want to be around their family and often show up in the photos. I have lots like these at birthdays and christmas.
The thing I can never work out is how I can take a photo in a visibly dusty environment and get no orbs at all with my digital camera. I have got what I believe to be spirit orbs with both digital and 35mm.
I think it good that you posted both the photos. It shows the same orbs there present with the family. If these are spirit who came to visit on a special day then it is unlikely that those present felt the spirits. Spirits who return to share in special occasions rarely make themselves felt like earthbound spirits do. You might notice also that there is 2 spirits here and one is a lot brighter than the other. It is obvious the orb difference in the 2 photos. One spirit has more energy than the other.
Yoiur photos look like a 4th generation photo and I bet it may even be 5th and 6th without you even realising it .
Edited by feusurlaneige, 26 June 2006 - 01:45 AM.
Posted 26 June 2006 - 11:08 AM
Posted 26 June 2006 - 09:04 PM
Yes it's a 4 generation photo I took while my gramma(mom's mom) was out. The other people in the pic is my sister, her 6week old baby and my mom.....
I always take photos with my digital at 6MP but, surely you can get dust or reflection with a quality camera and setting tho.
Posted 26 June 2006 - 09:36 PM
Dust orbs...normally are thin, whispy and mostly transparent. A ring around them is also a give away that they are dust/pollen, etc.
Paranormal orbs are much more opaque and appear three dimensional. They do not have to have a tail on them but sometimes do. They will get the tail from motion.
As far as cameras go any digital will easily highlight the particles in the air. That is what they do best...bring out everything causing many more dust orbs.
Posted 26 June 2006 - 11:16 PM
Posted 02 July 2006 - 06:48 PM
Dust is shown as an orb if it is too close to the camera lense and catches the reflection of the camera flash. If we see it passing through an object or behind something, then it is obviously too far to be dust and we all know that dust cannot pass through objects! So we will look at it, as having some kind of energy form.
Hope this helps!
Posted 03 July 2006 - 09:37 AM
Heck I think that number is even higher than that
Posted 03 July 2006 - 10:50 AM
When orbs show up in my pictures now I just make note of them. I don't say "dust" or "ghost", I just record "orb noted" even though I realize that they are orbs caused by environmental factors. But I wouldn't put them up on a website. Unless, of course, it's something really odd, which seems to be a rare occurence.
This is where the frustration with orbs lies. True ghost orbs do exist. The problem is they resemble environmental orbs so closely. It's good to see though that we're all finally starting to develop some guidelines as to what to look for when it comes to orbs.
As for the photos posted, I would have to say that they are caused by particles in the air.
Posted 10 July 2006 - 06:14 AM
Posted 10 July 2006 - 07:15 AM
Posted 10 July 2006 - 11:00 AM
This is an excellent idea. I've taken video footage of a lot of dust (the kind where you can actually see the air currents because there is so much. It's cool because it sort of looks like you're filming underwater)
and then there's the dust that only appears every so often alone, but you realize it's dust. This I always find odd because why only one if there is so many particles of various types in the air.
This may be a difficult task, but maybe one all us should keep in mind when we're filming. If we can get some sort of grasp on the particle aspect, it will surely make ghost research more solid and airtight. I look forward to this as it will create more of an understanding in regards to orbs and hopefully we'll see less of all orbs being classified as being paranormal in nature.
Posted 26 July 2006 - 05:21 PM
Remember dust orbs are normally close to your lense. Orbs can be a multitude of different natural reasons...dust, dirt, humidity, dander, rain, snow, basically anything in the air flying around. Once you shoot a photo with flash you illuminate it. If you don't use flash you tend to get less orbs that are natural reasons. Paranormal orbs have their own energy to them so if you get an orb when not using flash it's most likely something to look closer at. If it's a true Spirit orb it won't need flash to illuminate itself.
Now, natural orbs tend to be transparent, where you can see thru them. They don't have depth or dimension to them. They look basically flat and transparent.
In our experience most of the orbs our team has photographed can be explained in one reason or another. It could also be glare off a mirror or picture...or a spot of dirt on your lense.
The best way to eliminate video orbs is to place your IR lights away from your video camera lenses. We tried it both ways and found we got alot of orbs when the IR lights were right up with the lenses then down below or away from the lenses. If you are videotaping try doing that with the IR lights. Don't use the cameras IR lights...use external ones.
Posted 03 August 2006 - 02:18 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users