Can you explain these photographs?
#1
Posted 16 March 2009 - 07:39 AM
There are some pretty cool ones, but also some that are rather unimpressive.
#2
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:15 AM
I've often found that a collection of pictures like that hold some amazing ones and some that really, never should have found their way into a collection of spirit photos.
Krafted with luv
by monsters
#3
Posted 16 March 2009 - 01:31 PM
#4
Posted 16 March 2009 - 02:52 PM
plindboe, on Mar 16 2009, 08:39 AM, said:
There are some pretty cool ones, but also some that are rather unimpressive.
Some of those are pretty cool. I liked the Castle one and the face in the mirror of the car. Thanks for posting these..CE
#5
Posted 16 March 2009 - 06:43 PM
Thanks for posting these photographs; in my opinion, they serve a very useful purpose.
I can replicate every one of those photographs in Photoshop in less than a half hour each. It is a pretty trivial exercise.
Having said that, I issue a challenge to everybody:
pick any one of the photographs in the posting, and explain how you would fake it using any method other than Photoshop.
#6
Posted 16 March 2009 - 08:50 PM
Krafted with luv
by monsters
#7
Posted 16 March 2009 - 09:22 PM
...the one with the womans face in the rear-view mirror creeped me out...reminded me of the movie "mirrors". *shudders as a cold chill sweeps over me*
#8
Posted 16 March 2009 - 10:15 PM
canuck, on Mar 16 2009, 07:43 PM, said:
Thanks for posting these photographs; in my opinion, they serve a very useful purpose.
I can replicate every one of those photographs in Photoshop in less than a half hour each. It is a pretty trivial exercise.
Having said that, I issue a challenge to everybody:
pick any one of the photographs in the posting, and explain how you would fake it using any method other than Photoshop.
Edited by OMPRDave, 16 March 2009 - 10:20 PM.
#9
Posted 18 March 2009 - 03:07 PM
The "Ghost on the Beach" photo seems rather dumb to me though. It does indeed resemble a human figure from a distance, but in the close up it simply looks like a cavern, some of which is reflected in the water.
Nearly all of them I gave a "Normal explanation, but not fake" vote, i.e. pareidolia. Like OMPRDave, one of the few I thought looked genuinely fake was the "Ghost in field" photo.
I also find it amazing that people continue thinking orbs in photos are ghosts. It just seems like one the most mundane photographic errors one can possibly have. It's like exclaiming "ghost!" every time one hears a scratch on an LP.
Hi canuck, thanks for the welcome! Glad I've been missed.
#10
Posted 22 March 2009 - 07:46 AM
canuck, on Mar 16 2009, 06:43 PM, said:
Thanks for posting these photographs; in my opinion, they serve a very useful purpose.
I can replicate every one of those photographs in Photoshop in less than a half hour each. It is a pretty trivial exercise.
Having said that, I issue a challenge to everybody:
pick any one of the photographs in the posting, and explain how you would fake it using any method other than Photoshop.
#11
Posted 20 April 2009 - 11:24 AM
canuck, on Mar 16 2009, 06:43 PM, said:
Wedding ghost posted April 4th: tux guy's arms are behind his back, like he was holding something. If it was a coat or shawl of some sort, that would cause the fabric drape that looks like the fold guys get with trousers (look in between tux's legs [that's what she said]). The item's hem could have caused the appearance of a shoe on the left. And people don't remember details like that very well, who was holding what when.
So I'd simply have somebody nonchalantly hold a coat behind their back.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











