Harry Potter
#16
Posted 10 October 2005 - 11:03 AM
#17
Posted 10 October 2005 - 01:04 PM
And credible or not, the Harry Potter series is simply a work of fiction.
Krafted with luv
by monsters
#18
Posted 10 October 2005 - 01:18 PM
BTW, I love the Harry Potter books as fantasy and can't wait for the Goblet of Fire movie to be released.
I didn't lose my mind - I have it backed up on a disk ... somewhere
#19
Posted 10 October 2005 - 08:53 PM
Krafted with luv
by monsters
#20
Posted 10 October 2005 - 09:48 PM
#21
Posted 13 October 2005 - 10:59 AM
There are some extreme fundamentalist Christians who style themselves YECs Young Earth Creationists. They believe that the earth is only 6000 years old! How credible is that?
#22
Posted 13 October 2005 - 02:30 PM
Tangnefedd, on Oct 13 2005, 11:59 AM, said:
There are some extreme fundamentalist Christians who style themselves YECs Young Earth Creationists. They believe that the earth is only 6000 years old! How credible is that?
There is archeological/geological evidence for a major catastrophic flood in the region now associated with the lands of the Bible. Not exactly a 'world wide' flood, but given how the people at that time percevied the world, to them it was.
So, flood itself, yes. Happened.
Otherwise, what you are referring to is simply a form of mythology. NO, and I repeat NO culture with creation myths had 'credible' ones. It's a myth. A method of explaination exactly for the reasons you give, and the majority of Christians (for example) are 100% aware of that. They KNOW it's not to be taken literally although I do conceed that there is a small, but vocal, minority that do. Do not tar all Christians with that brush though. Totally unfair.
On the other hand, the tales to be found in the Harry Potter book are really, in the end, no more credible, since they are nothing more than works of fiction from the imagination of a very good author. So really, I still can't see the point you've drawn.
Krafted with luv
by monsters
#23
Posted 13 October 2005 - 03:06 PM
Quote
Hi I'm a Catholic and I've been studying in a Catholic school for years.
The Garden of Eden and Adam and Eve are just symbols of what really took place... the reason? East Asian and Indian people were already flourishing even before Israel and Egypt.... Infact the first three civilizations sprouted in Asia, namely Huang Ho and Yangtze Valley, The fertile Crescent.....
Even the story of David and Goliath has it's exagerations.... perhaps its a mistranslation from the original texts to the english version.... probably the word 'big' beacame 'gigantic' and although they are synonymous 'gigantic' is different from big.... so Goliath became a giant instead of just a very tall and wide person...
And about the Harry Potter books... like it! But I would prefer the Chronicles of Narnia, but that's just me...
#24
Posted 13 October 2005 - 06:28 PM
From what I understand of David and Goliath, the giant was just over 7 feet tall. He was a giant, but not in the sense as the giant in Jack and the Beanstalk.
There are two major schools of thought regarding Adam and Eve in my Church. Brigham Young and James E. Talmage believed in pre-Adamites -- people who lived on this earth before Adam and Eve. They taught that Adam and Eve were merely the parents of our race, and the first to receive the gospel of Jesus Christ. Joseph Fielding Smith and Bruce R McConkie taught that Adam and Eve were literally the first humans on this world. The Church has not declared which school of thought it officially accepts (Brigham Young and Joseph Fielding Smith were both prophets and Presidents of the Church).
I didn't lose my mind - I have it backed up on a disk ... somewhere
#25
Posted 14 November 2005 - 05:41 AM
Thats just like letting them watch a movie and something they do not be true to life...people its fiction...
Get over it.....
</a>
#26
Posted 14 November 2005 - 09:02 AM
cooolchick647, on Nov 14 2005, 10:41 AM, said:
Thats just like letting them watch a movie and something they do not be true to life...people its fiction...
Get over it.....
The Harry Potter books are delightful, but of course they are fiction, no more, no less. The Bible is the authors' perception of God. Perceptions change, so do our ideas of God. I think our spirituality has to evolve not stay static in a 2000 year old time warp.
#27
Posted 14 November 2005 - 11:59 AM
But I do think that we should make sure we show/teach our children in a way that leads them on choosing what facts/fiction that they may end up using for themselves as a good tool for understanding..
I myself wouldnt use anyone real or not real for my children to follow...I want them to use what wisdom is within themselves and looking at events and stories as just a tool of common sense....
#28
Posted 14 November 2005 - 04:34 PM
little_light, on Nov 14 2005, 04:59 PM, said:
But I do think that we should make sure we show/teach our children in a way that leads them on choosing what facts/fiction that they may end up using for themselves as a good tool for understanding..
I myself wouldnt use anyone real or not real for my children to follow...I want them to use what wisdom is within themselves and looking at events and stories as just a tool of common sense....
I agree with you
#30
Posted 19 December 2005 - 07:46 PM
I think that it is AWESOME that a church is using HP as a basis to teach children about virtues and other religious related things.....no matter the religion. I think that is a smart concept to help teach something morally vital and having examples of things that they, if they are fans of HP as many are, understand a lot better then some things. It teaches children quicker if they have examples all ready in place in their mind...
And I agree as many, that HP is not satanic or demonic or any of that ignorant drabble.... it is a book, nothing more than a world thought up by J. K Rowling....
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











