4 replies to this topic

[MoonChild]

The mummy of Pope St. Pius I is one of the best preserved in the history of mankind. His corpse was not embalmed, it was mummified naturally for a period of about 1,700 years.

 

However, the most surprising thing was that they found a plenty of documents narrating different versions of the alleged life of the son of God, Jesus of Nazareth.

 

The discovery suggests that senior leaders of the Catholic Church hid the evidence that proves that the history of the Messiah was only an invention to carry out the purposes of the order.

 

 

Read Complete article here:-

 

http://www.dinosmark...ound-68304.html

[greg_dragonlvr]

I have been seeing this tidbit on various site for a bit. None of them are particularly well written.  That Christianity in general is based on some pretty feeble pillars is a given.  Folks who study the histories of religious mythology have been pointing out the mish-mash of cultures that early Christians borrowed and kidnapped to legitimize their brand of religion for years.  The big question I get from this is why this stuff was buried with him.  The documents were all common stories all over the Mediterranean region.  So stuffing those stories in with the body would not have hidden or eliminated the stories that were well known everywhere else.  So, did they stick them in there to give him something to read while waiting for the second coming? 

[loganinkosovo]

More anti-Catholic BS as usual.

 

I will stick with a religion that has a new testament or equivalent where ever it comes from.

 

At least that shows they are trying.

 

All religions started as a "Cult", usually in defiance of the established religion at the time.

 

Christianity took such a foothold in the Roman Empire because it incorporated many pagan ideas which made the Army happy and meant that Roman women did not have to allow Roman Priests of Roman Gods to strangle their babies and call it a religious observance.

 

Many "Religions" have not got past the "Cult" stage and many established religions needed overthrowing. Some still do.

 

I've seen the result of some still do.

[greg_dragonlvr]

I'm sure there was a point there somewhere.  But as to Moonie's question, do you agree or disagree?

[loganinkosovo]

I'm sure there was a point there somewhere.  But as to Moonie's question, do you agree or disagree?

 

 

I don't believe the "Stories" were put in with a Saint's body just Like I know the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are made up anti-Semitic BS.

 

So I guess the answer is NO.

 

Any study of the early church shows how it adopted pagan Ideas to make the new converts feel more at home.... like Christmas Trees.

 

In the beginning there was not just one church. There were Roman and other Catholic Churches like the Eastern Church and the Irish Church. Each with it's own way of doing things. After the great Schism there was the Byzantine Church which gave birth to all the Orthodox Churches where they took Aristocracy as Saints instead of people who actually did something saintly. Thus maintaining and reinforcing the Aristocracy's control over the Surfs and Peasants. The Irish Church allowed their Priests to Marry up until the Roman Church took over. Roman Priests still had common law wives after that but were not allowed to marry, there by keeping all the property and money for the Church and not the priest's children. Saint Vincent De Paul spent most of his career as a priest trying to keep the French priests out of Whore Houses... he failed.