Jump to content

Click Here To Visit Our Sponsor


Name of CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) changing

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 GiaCat21


    Village Elder

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,324 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Morrison, Colorado
  • Interests:I love to sleep!!! I also enjoy reading, some of my favorite authors would be Stephen King, Anne Rice, and Edgar Allen Poe. My favorite tv shows are Ghost Hunters, America's Most Haunted, I Shouldn't be Alive, anything on the Discovery Health Channel, Myth Busters, Desperate Houswives, Grey's Anatomy, House, American Idol, Trading Spouses, The Simpsons, Family Guy, King of the Hill. But I obviously don't watch any tv. I also enjoy making new, pretty medic alert braclets, and earrings.

Posted 11 February 2007 - 05:36 PM

I found this on a dysautonomia board that I frequent (dinet, if you're so inclined to ask)... The poster found this in the CFS journal. I know of at least one other villager who has Chronic Fatigue which really is an inappropiate name for such a debilatating condition. Not to mention some docs diagnose it secondary to depression (that's happened to me more times than I can count). Besides the bone crushing exhaustion that you get with this is so much more than "fatigue". Example... I fall asleep at 8 pm and wake up at 12 pm (there's 14 hrs for night) and typically nap for another 2 hrs during the day... I'd say that's a little more than fatigue. So for you other CFSers... ENJOY!

Seated (clockwise): Drs. Anthony Komaroff, David Bell, Nancy Klimas, Leonard Jason,
Charles Lapp, Lucinda Bateman, Paul Cheney

An announcement from ProHealth Founder Rich Carson:

The CFS Name Change Advisory Board - whose combined research and clinical experience totals more than 150 years - met in Florida January 12, and reached a consensus agreement that a new name should be adopted for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. While it is certain that no name will please all patients, the group feels that the new name they propose will improve the legitimacy of the disease, and remove the stigma of having a disease with 'fatigue' as the primary descriptor. Their report follows.

A group of noted CFS researchers and clinicians met January 12 in Florida to discuss whether 'Chronic Fatigue Syndrome' was an appropriate name for the disease, and to suggest an alternative name if necessary. Patients and CFS clinicians have long held that 'chronic fatigue syndrome' trivializes the serious nature of the disorder, and have called for a change of the name first adopted by the CDC in 1988.

The impetus for assembling the group was the belief that a panel of the world's leading experts could provide legitimacy and scientific credibility to patients seeking a new name.

The committee, called "the CFS Name Change Advisory Board" by its organizer, CFS patient Rich Carson, included Drs. Lucinda Bateman, David Bell, Paul Cheney, Charles Lapp, Nancy Klimas, Anthony Komaroff, Leonard Jason, and Daniel Peterson. Dr. Peterson was unable to attend the meeting, but was consulted via telephone afterward.

Committee members agreed that CFS downplays the severity of the disease and is hurtful to patients, and discussion focused on alternative names. The majority of attention was spent discussing 'ME' - the name first used to describe the illness in an editorial published in The Lancet in 1956 by Sir Donald Acheson, MD. 'ME' has been used in many countries, including Great Britain.

'ME' has historically been used to describe 'Myalgic Encephalomyelitis' (nervous system inflammation involving muscle pain) - a term that does not accurately describe the disease process in all patients. Committee members preferred 'Myalgic Encephalopathy' (nervous system pathology with associated muscle pain), which is also abbreviated 'ME'. This satisfied the researchers that this form of the term 'ME' is diagnostically accurate.

Recent scientific advances point to the usefulness of the ME label, as brain pathology with often painful consequences, especially in muscle, is increasingly documented in patients with this condition.

The group recognized that dropping CFS completely from a new name could cause problems with disability and medical insurance claims, and recommended that 'CFS' should accompany any new name, at least for a period of time. It was acknowledged that CFS currently has some name recognition, though according to the CDC, less than 20 percent of the patients have been diagnosed.

The researchers expressed their belief that the term 'ME/CFS' (or 'CFS/ME') is diagnostically accurate and, unlike CFS, is not pejorative to patients. It was also noted that this move is consistent with events occurring in different countries, such as Canada, where 'CFS' was recently changed to 'ME/CFS'.

In a recent related event, the board of directors of the International Association for CFS (IACFS) voted to recommend that the name of that organization be changed to the IACFS/ME. This motion is currently being voted on by its members, and if approved, the name of that organization will soon be changed

Love life.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users