But you see, Puti, that skepticism
is good. Not calling
BS on everything that happens, but thinking that something might have a logical explanation, instead of completely blocking out logic just for the sake of saying "Yay! I'm sensitive to the paranormal!!!".
Here's a prime example:
A few years ago (right about the time I'd gotten fed up with being here), there was a person (I forget their name) posting here that had all sorts of questions about ghosts and "oooh, I might be psychic" sort of things. They posted on here that one night, as they were going to sleep, they thought they heard voices near a window. Whispers. Saying things like "I think they are asleep", or something like that.
Now...I read that and asked a few questions of the OP. But my line of questions were more about the security of the poster's home. Are there security lights with motion sensors...implying that maybe the voices the OP heard were coming from outside the house, and it could have been someone looking to break in. The OP
never considered that! They were so quick to jump onto the "sensitive to the paranormal" bandwagon that common sense is completely tossed away. It infuriated me that someone could completely overlook something like that. But that's why you
need to have a bit of skepticism. That's why I say "use your mind, but also use your brain". Remember: not everything that goes "bump" in the night is a ghost.
If you're enough of a skeptic, you try to rule out the obvious first. Then you might end up with either the unexplained, or something that's truly "paranormal". But, even if something is unexplained, it doesn't automatically mean that it's "paranormal". It just means that you've ruled out the obvious.
In case you're wondering, I
do believe in what's been called "paranormal". In fact, I've dealt with it enough, I actually consider it a part of everything else that's "normal".
And Puti - next time I agree with you, I'll let you know ahead of time, so you could sit down first. Wouldn't want you passing out!