EVP's and radio interefence
Posted 24 October 2011 - 10:08 PM
I noticed a post on a youtube video referencing the possibility of EVP being radio interference and thought to myself "I never considered that." So I did a little bit of digging around and haven't found anything that really was conclusive regarding the amount of interference a recorder receives and the odds of picking up entire words or phrases.
So can anyone point me in the right direction for some solid information on the subject? If I were in a better financial position I would just buy a recorder and find out for myself. Also, when I ask I am speaking more abound the standard digital or cassette recorders that people will pick up to investigate with.
Looking forward to some responses!
Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:00 PM
Better quality recorders are shielded against outside EM Fields must more effectively than cheaper recorders. A method called single point grounding will be employed in the design. It's more expensive, requires better grade of design, but will help to minimize this interference.
Another design improvement is the recorder will incorporate a Faraday shield in its design. Maybe not something obvious, but close examination will show how component placement and layout uses various techniques to provide both real and virtual shielding of crucial front end components.
Actual design of equipment involves extensive work and the theory behind ground loops, common mode rejection, and impedance matching are quite complex. However it is attention to these details which separate the good equipment from the junk.
Labs can test for the effectiveness of such shielding as well. I do these tests on equipment I build under contract. The method involves using an EM generator, and a modulated RF source. The tests involve exposing the DUT (Device Under Test) to these fields while monitoring its operation. If the shielding is working the EM sources will not in any way be detected by the device. But if the shielding is faulty it will interfere. And in the real world, if the device can be interefered with by these signals it can also be influenced by real world signals like radio stations, power lines, stray audio, or any number of culprits. Most cheap equipment will fail these tests miserably. Thus any supposed EVPs captured cannot be trusted to be legitimate; instead they are assumed to be this outside interference.
Visit my website
Posted 26 October 2011 - 03:22 PM
Thank you once again,
Posted 26 October 2011 - 05:28 PM
Thanks for the response caverat. I was hoping you would chime in! I'll be delving farther into the information in your post, and in the meantime I do have a question. Is there any out of the box recorder that you could recommend for teams to avoid the majority of external interference? Or is there a simple modification that can be made?
Thank you once again,
I can only recommend what I have tested and to date the cheapest digital recorder that meets specs is the H2. And only when used in its HQ setting. I also recommend using external mics spaced apart so you can do spatial analysis, the internal phased array simulates stereo but does not provide true diversified pick-up. There may be other recorders but I have not tested them so obviously I can neither recommend nor reject them. I have tested the H2 in my lab so it is on my tests that I can say it meets specs. If cost is not a factor I can also recommend the Fostex FR2 as I have also used that one. But at around $1,000 most people balk at the $$$.
Visit my website
Posted 26 October 2011 - 06:18 PM
Thanks a ton!
Posted 27 October 2011 - 08:16 AM
I'm still trying to find a copy of this recording as his old website has gone the way of the Dodo so I can post it as an example of interference on my own site.
Posted 27 October 2011 - 04:08 PM
It is also a darned good example of what I was asking about.
Thanks for that!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users