Scientology
#16
Posted 12 June 2004 - 02:00 PM
Ana
#17
Posted 12 June 2004 - 08:41 PM
#18
Posted 10 August 2005 - 01:59 PM
Scientology Lies
FAQS
I'm loving the site Gregory posted, it has a new section "Tom Cruise is Nuts" They might wanna get a new spokesperson
#19
Posted 10 August 2005 - 02:04 PM
However, Tom Cruise is putting Scientology in a very bad light with his bizzare little rants. I don't know exactly what the whole story is, but something ISN'T right....be it with Scientology or with Cruise....
Krafted with luv
by monsters
#20
Posted 10 August 2005 - 03:22 PM
http://bernie.cncfam...c/irc_intro.htm
So it could just be the guy who compiled that page being purposefully selective with the criticism's it's discussing. But even the main site given to critic it states "On the surface the Church of Scientology seems reasonable"
It seems to me to be a composite of every belief or idea that might or might not have been popular- but were at least well known in the 50's. I mean we have the idea that we can become Gods if we free ourselves of all earthly trappings, which must be one of the most common promises of any religion (achieve nirvana, ascend to heaven, reach perfection). Then there's the christian, Cartesian duality. The split between the physical and the spiritual self that many christian philosophers have used to explain free will, personality, individuality and divinity - not to mention existance itself. The Theta and the Mest is a little similar to the phenomena and naumena - only a little more defined and precise. The idea that we are the way we are - read "messed up" - being a result of past life traumas seems to be a mix of an ill conceived notion of karma and the idea of original sin.
Duality has long since been out of fashion amongst philosophers- mainly due to modern pschology and medicine, but the arguments are still very appealing, granted. However this split between the physical and the spiritual world is thought by most to be impossible due to the conservation of energy ideas- as in no energy can be created or destroyed within a system, and in order to exert force or control something in the physical world it's generally agreed that something most abide by the rules of the physical world, or else those rules would no longer apply at all. In other words, unless these spiritual natural laws were exactly the same as our physical natural laws, and the spirital theta was in fact part of the physical world the theta could have no influence on the Mesta.
I'd personally be worried about any religion that offered only personal understanding and great powers with no greater understanding of such things like WHY ARE WE HERE? I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd rather know that than exist in some God like state- and I'm sorry but their promise of maybe, possibly knowing everything just doesn't cut it. The whole thing sets itself up as a search for truth and understanding, but as far as I can see offers none.
One thing I'd like to say to anybody reading up on scientology- be very carefull of the emotive wording of both sides of the argument.
The point which I should first wish to understand is whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods.
Sonnet XCIVBut if that flower with base infection meet,The basest weed outbraves his dignity:For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds#21
Posted 10 August 2005 - 08:21 PM
As for Tom Cruise, there's been a lot of speculation that he might be suffering from manic-depression. That can explain why he's jumping around like a nut one minute and cussing out a reporter the next.
#23
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:02 AM
I couldn't help but jump in when I saw a subject so 'near and dear' to my heart.
To be absolutely upfront...I am *totally* opposed to the *Church* of Scientology. I have heard that there are splinter groups (called Free Zoners) some of which use no coercion or underhanded techniques with their members (or in recruiting members). I do know there are groups called Free Zoners, however, I don't know if it's true that some of these groups operate above board. If there are such groups, I may not agree with their 'religion', but I respect their right to practice it.
Ok. Now that I've (attempted to) establish the fact that I'm not some zealot <G>, I thought you may find the following links of interest.
This site's webmaster, Arnie Lerma, is an ex-Scientologist:
http://www.lermanet.com/
This is a quick link to the webmaster's reasons for leaving Scientology:
http://www.lermanet....exit/FINAL2.htm
This is a link to an interview with L. Ron Hubbard, *Jr* that blows my mind:
http://www.lermanet....eWolfe07-82.htm
Off the topic...I look forward to getting to know all of you!!!
Bews
#24
Posted 11 August 2005 - 01:21 PM
Though some of what I'm reading is quite horrific- the above cited website (http://www.lermanet.com/) claims that the e-meter induces the release of certain endorphines similar to taking cocain and that you can get addicted to it- indeed it claims this is one of the main causes for the success of Scientology. Whereas the official site (which scares me just a bit- with it's flash demonstrations of happy smily people) claims that the e-meter simply measures how affected you are by something and how likely you are to have suffered trauma from the incident described. It claims that it's a highly precise tool that does nothing whatsoever to the user. The idea that a device that has only contact with the palms of your hands is at all detailed or precise as they claim seems a bit far fetched- but that's what the picture showed. Now, I've been for an EEG scan- which involved a lot of wires stuck to my head... this was intended to measure neural activity and was not as precise as these guys seem to think their e-meter is.
This whole e-meter thing could, if true (the critics version of the story that is) explain Tom Cruise's behaviour - the manic depression and mood swings associated with addiction? But it all depends on who you want to believe, I can't seem to find any non-bias source on this.
The point which I should first wish to understand is whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods.
Sonnet XCIVBut if that flower with base infection meet,The basest weed outbraves his dignity:For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds#25
Posted 11 August 2005 - 02:55 PM
I honestly don't know if the E-meter itself could be used as a form of persuasion on any level other than psychological.
I don't doubt that the E-meter causes some type of physical/cellular reaction if Mr. Lerma's technical information is correct.
The electrical output (of the E-meter) seems to be along the same lines as the average TENS unit (around the size of a small pager, complete with electrodes). When I was given a TENS unit years ago, I was told its' function was to interfere with the "pain message" being sent from my back to my brain. I was also told the unit would stimulate the release of endorphins, so I can believe the part of Mr. Lerma's theory that indicates an E-meter may produce the same effect.
I'm not, however, convinced the physiological response to the E-meter is all that important to Scientology's success with its' members. I'm not saying it's not possible, just that I'd need more evidence before I could believe it.
#26
Posted 13 August 2005 - 08:05 AM
Quote
Yes, it costs you money, and they tell you that there's something wrong with you and that for SUCH AND SUCH amount, we CAN fix you... but only after you pay our special introductory offer.......... lol
I figure there's some good points to it, like the way Hawkers was saying, Travolta's ability to manipulate the people he talks with (Jedi Mind tricks eh? lol), but then any good Witch worth his or her salt can do that..... Basic magick, and it doesn't cost half a million to learn how to do it.........
#27
Posted 14 August 2005 - 12:11 AM
#28
Posted 14 August 2005 - 08:47 AM
It is nothing unless you subscribe to it , just like any other religion or belief.
Its a system of belief. Buy it or not , the choice is yours.
Free will rules
Rockhauler2k1
#29
Posted 12 February 2006 - 12:20 PM
hairpin, on Jun 10 2004, 11:12 PM, said:
CHRISTY SPEAR WHERE ARE YOU!?!?
Hi, my name is Christy Spear. My husband asked if I ever googled my name, and here I am. I'm guessing Megan Keith wrote this, since the address is Austin, TX? Hi, Megan. Always had a flair for embellishment didn't you?
First of all, that entire article was absolute bs and you know it. The only "truth" to it was that I had a party and trashed the house with the help of other kids. I'm not even going to bother trying to defend to the rest, it's absolute crap. If you want to believe that Scientology is a cult, go right ahead. If you've already made up your mind, I won't confuse you with the facts. If you would like to find out about Scientology, the only valid source is www.scientology.org. Just remember that people can say whatever they want, regardless of whether there is any merit to what they say!
#30
Posted 15 February 2006 - 09:51 PM
Scientology is no Jonestown. Jim Jones gave his people a trip to Belize, and put them out of their misery, and that's more than you'll get out of the bloodsuckers at Scientology!
And, in parting from you now,
This much let me avow---
You are not wrong, who deem
That my days have been a dream:
Yet if hope has flown away In a night,
Or in a day, In a vision, or in none,
Is it therefore the less gone?
All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














