Wiccans/Pagans
#1
Posted 10 March 2004 - 07:16 PM
#2
Posted 11 March 2004 - 04:58 AM
Paganism is actually a term that encompases many different religions like Shamanism, Wiccan etc.
#3
Posted 11 March 2004 - 05:37 AM
#4
Posted 11 March 2004 - 08:01 PM
#5
Posted 11 March 2004 - 09:27 PM
The witches' ritual salute with kisses, on each foot, on each knee, on the lower abdomen, on each breast and on the lips, eight kisses in all. Normally used only within the ritual Circle.
#6
Posted 12 March 2004 - 11:52 AM
EDIT: ok, ok, so I'm a bit of a whacko when it comes to this, as I am a medicine talker, and recently someone tried to lump me in with a group of "witches" in the area, that are nothing more than a bunch of kids, dressing up like goths, and playing "the Craft" (trust me, they named themselves after the characters, and all but act the movie out...) also growing up, my family was the subject of a local church's wrath, and the pastor attempted to use us, to scare his flock... so I'm a little sensitive on the subject.. sorry.
#7
Posted 12 March 2004 - 04:29 PM
Pagans worship the four elements, or more if they consider more as part of the grand scheme. Polytheistic religions have deities and are therefore more "mainstream" religions.
Just thought you all would like to know.
#8
Posted 13 March 2004 - 12:43 AM
now marahet, what you are describing, is closer to my faith, Shamanism, or Druidiam...in fact, I myself, am primarily an earth worshipper, along with honoring, the sun, and moon, and sky...
#9
Posted 13 March 2004 - 04:08 AM
Wicca is a Neopagan religion founded by the British civil servant Gerald Gardner in the 1930s. Gardner claimed that the religion was a survival of matriarchal religions of pre-historic Europe, taught to him by a woman named Dorothy Clutterbuck. Many believe he invented it himself, drawing on such sources as Aradia: Gospel of the Witches by Charles G. Leland, Freemasonry and ceremonial magic; and while Clutterbuck certainly existed, Ronald Hutton concludes that she is unlikely to have been involved in Gardner's Craft activities.
The point which I should first wish to understand is whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods.
Sonnet XCIVBut if that flower with base infection meet,The basest weed outbraves his dignity:For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds#10
Posted 13 March 2004 - 06:34 AM
#11
Posted 13 March 2004 - 06:51 AM
The point which I should first wish to understand is whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods.
Sonnet XCIVBut if that flower with base infection meet,The basest weed outbraves his dignity:For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds#12
Posted 13 March 2004 - 02:21 PM
#13
Posted 13 March 2004 - 11:29 PM
#14
Posted 14 March 2004 - 03:37 AM
I'm not sure, but I don't think neither Crowley nor neopagans would have said they were towards the black side, though Crowley did deliberately call himself the beast from the book of revelations and he identified greatly with the number 666...
And if by cult you mean secretive, a little selective in its members, then yes.
The point which I should first wish to understand is whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods.
Sonnet XCIVBut if that flower with base infection meet,The basest weed outbraves his dignity:For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds#15
Posted 14 March 2004 - 07:32 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











