Film vs Digital.
Posted 12 October 2008 - 09:16 PM
Posted 12 October 2008 - 09:24 PM
And another one just for discussion...what if all "sightings" of spirits are on a psychic level and we don't really see them with the eye but sense them with some other part of the brain or soul and then our brains create the image based on that "6th sense.?" If even some ghost sightings are like that then photos would never capture those kinds of "sightings."
I like using real film for anything important...just a personal preference. Although film gets expensive after awhile, especially if you snap off pics like mad at a site or even just photo a haunted site to document everything without expecting ghosts to show up in the pics. So digital is certainly a big help. As for the "which is better?" or "which constitutes better proof?" questions...it's been debated to death before.
Posted 13 October 2008 - 09:35 AM
Posted 13 October 2008 - 09:31 PM
Of course that doesn/t mean you'll capture anything paranormal just because you use a camera. Truth be told there is no proof the paranormal has anything in the IR spectrum, only theories. But the topic here relates only to whether a camera can detect outside the visible spectrum, not that it detects spirits or whatever.
Visit my website, "The Paranormal DESTINATION"
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users