Who Forted! What NOT To Get Your Ghost Hunter For Christmas
Hope you enjoy it!
Edited by OMPRDave, 03 December 2009 - 11:55 PM.
|
Posted 03 December 2009 - 11:54 PM
Edited by OMPRDave, 03 December 2009 - 11:55 PM.
Posted 04 December 2009 - 12:21 AM
Posted 04 December 2009 - 09:20 AM
Posted 04 December 2009 - 09:51 AM
Posted 04 December 2009 - 10:19 AM
Posted 04 December 2009 - 04:30 PM
Posted 04 December 2009 - 08:51 PM
Figure in all the stuff that has no proven basis in paranormal research into the equation like the Talking Boxes, Ovilus, Puck, and other junk out there and you can see where the new guy and his money can get parted in quite a hurry (it is good to note Santa won’t be bringing any Pucks this year as they are discontinued on the Digital Dowsing website).
Very good article with excellent advice, as I feel all of the "me too" ghost hunting shows have done a great deal of damage to those that have been in the field for a very long time. However, I do have to disagree with the statement above, as there is also no "proven basis" for EMF meters and digital recorders in paranormal research. I now own a Zoom H2 and H4n, and agree that the higher sampling rates these units are capable of make a world of difference, and greatly reduce the possibily that digital atifacts, sampling errors, etc. are causing false positives. Having said that, there is no proven basis for EVP's, what cause them, or (if they are created my sprits) how they are imprinted on the recording device. There are plenty of theories, but that's about it. The same can be said of EMF meters, including the Trifield.
Again, it's an excellent article. Use cheap equipment, and you will find ghosts everywhere. You get what you pay for.
Posted 04 December 2009 - 09:52 PM
Posted 04 December 2009 - 10:05 PM
Posted 27 December 2009 - 05:46 AM
Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:33 AM
Thanks, guys. Please knwo I don;t knock anyone or their methods and equipment...for God sakes, have fun with it all if it makes you happy. I wrote this more for the serious researcher and how mainstream media can influence it. I respect EVERYONE'S opinions.
Makes me glad you liked it, and I appreciate the criticism...happy holidays!
Posted 22 February 2010 - 12:57 PM
Edited by Robot, 22 February 2010 - 01:00 PM.
Posted 22 February 2010 - 01:39 PM
I disagree on many points,
The "properly" designed Fararaday Cage will stop EMF's, this is well understood documented Physics.
If genuine evidence was gathered, inside the cage, evidence would not be "credible", it would Nobel Prize worthy!
From an Classical Physics perspective, EMF not passing through a Faraday Cage is very different than EMF easily passing through a wall.
I'm not trying to argue, just state solid science. If you have a model or evidence to get around this I'd love to see or hear it.
I prefer to base my models on Science. Speculation is good, but speculation built on a solid foundation is better.
Posted 22 February 2010 - 01:40 PM
Posted 22 February 2010 - 01:57 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users