Free Skins
© Fisana

Jump to content


Photo

Conspiracy Theories


  • Please log in to reply
77 replies to this topic

#76 Spiritw0lf

Spiritw0lf

    Junior Villager

  • New Member
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • Location:Allen Park, MI
  • Interests:Spirits and wolves ;)

Posted 12 September 2006 - 08:36 PM

Flight 93 wasnt destroyed, there was no sign of a plane at the crash site, and the Cleveland airport reported that it landed at 10:10 September 11, 2001. Everyone evacuated to a nearby Navy base. As far as i know, they were never seen again, and reported dead in a plane crash. Suspicious?

Also, in the crash site at the Pentagon, there was no sign of a Boeing 747 hitting the building. Why were there no signs of any planes in the crash sites at the pentagon and where Flight 93 was supposedly crashed? This is the only time in history a plane vanished at a crash site. Suspicious?

Also, the government claimed none of the black boxes were recovered. There were four. Firefighters claimed they found three. I think it was an inside job. Also, after the north tower was hit, every plane in US was demanded to land and none could take off. Exept for 2 military planes. Also, the government claims the fire from the jet fuel destroyed the building, when it was clearly explosions from inside the building. And, a nearby seismograph recorded 2.3 on the scales. With the car bomb attack earlier, nothing was recorded on the seismograph. This means there must have been explosives planted under the building. Who could have possibly gotten in to plant explosives? Why werent they caught?

A couple years before the attack, there were strange drills where the entire building was evacuated, exept for the military. At the same time of the drills, bomb sniffing dogs were abruptly removed from the building. Could the military have been planting charges?

This thread is becoming a 9/11 thread, lol...

Edited by Spiritw0lf, 12 September 2006 - 08:37 PM.

Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#77 Justa

Justa

    Champion YMCA dancer and professional spaghetti nose shooter

  • Town Council
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,497 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 14 September 2006 - 09:47 AM

From my understanding, there was never any doubt as to the crash site of flight 93, and there was wreckage there. The question was whether the jet crashed because the passengers fought for control of it, or whether it was shot down by the air force. There were "eye witness" accounts of debris found miles away, as well as a smaller jet circling it, and then reports of an explosion in the air.


There have always been conspiracies of varying degrees. Et tu Brute, Guy Fawkes, Go Black Sox, diamonds are a girls De Beers best friend, buy Enron, etc etc. Any of these sound familiar? Do a little research and you will find the stories behind them if you are interested.

So it is conceivable that conspiracies are out there. It's just a question of how big are they, who really is in charge of them, and what do they really hope to gain?
Posted Image

#78 spooksareus

spooksareus

    Graceful leader of men who harvests wheat

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,003 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Aptos, California
  • Interests:Healthy friends, supernatural science (oxy morans, lol!), cooking & baking, all animals, playing music (mostly jazz), art (all mediums), interesting & open minded people, truth, justice and liberal politics...

Posted 14 September 2006 - 11:12 AM

There have always been conspiracies of varying degrees. Et tu Brute, Guy Fawkes, Go Black Sox, diamonds are a girls De Beers best friend, buy Enron, etc etc. Any of these sound familiar? Do a little research and you will find the stories behind them if you are interested.

So it is conceivable that conspiracies are out there. It's just a question of how big are they, who really is in charge of them, and what do they really hope to gain?



:ghost: All of them are familiar to me ;) Just follow the money in most cases... :D

"It is perfectly monstrous the way people go about, nowadays, saying things against one behind one's back that are absolutely and entirely true." -Oscar Wilde “The Picture of Dorian Gray”





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users