Ghosts - research, evidence, and discussion.
Newsletter Subscription:
Subscribe to our free monthly email newsletter:


Features Archive:

2012 Archive:
 LIVE from Oddfest 2012
December 18, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Zombie Advocate Greg Lawson
December 11, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

The Real Exorcist Case with Thomas B. Allen
November 27, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Embracing the Joy of Ghost Hunting by Deonna Kelli Sayed
November 28, 2012


LIVE from the Haunted Stanley Hotel
November 20, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Animal Mutilations and ETs with Chuck Zukowski
November 13, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

The Origins of the Devil with Corvis Nocturnum
November 6, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

LIVE From Wareham's Haunted History Night
October 30, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Real Halloween Ghost Stories -- Part One
October 26, 2012


LIVE from the Central Texas Paranormal Conference
October 16, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Chasing Spirits with Nick Groff
October 2, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Real Wolfmen with Linda Godfrey
September 25, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Trekking the Ghost Frontier: Challenges and Opportunities by Deonna Kelli Sayed
September 21, 2012


Your Cryptid Encounters
September 4, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Lost Technology from the Great Pyramids with Steven Myers
August 28, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Harassing Spirits by Sharon Schindlbeck
August 27, 2012


Black Eyed Kids with David Weatherly
August 21, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

LIVE From the 3rd Annual Michigan ParaCon
August 14, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Time Slips
August 7, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

LIVE from Eastern State Penitentiary: Scared Straight
July 31, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Top Five Cornish Haunted Locations by Mark Porter
July 31, 2012


U.S. Civil War Ghosts with Mark Nesbitt
July 24, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Haunted Objects with Christopher Balzano and Tim Weisberg
July 17, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

The Paranormal Vatican with Gary Jansen
July 10, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Fact or Faked's Ben Hansen by Jennifer Hitt
June 27, 2012


Mission #100 Special
June 26, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Phone Calls from the Dead with Cal Cooper
June 19, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

The Real Dracula with Dave Schrader
June 12, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

A Supernatural Life: Richard T. Crowe by Ursula Bielski
June 11, 2012


All I Have is My Word by Angela Ward
June 6, 2012


What If the Government Disclosed E.T.s Are Real?
June 5, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Paranormal and the Law with Psychic Lawyer Mark Anthony
May 22, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Guidelines to Presenting Paranormal Evidence by Nick Ferra
May 18, 2012


Your Paranormal Encounters - 3 Year Anniversary Special
May 15, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Crop Circles with Patty Greer
May 8, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

After Death Communication with Gary Galka
May 1, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Living Legend Series: Troy Taylor
April 25, 2012


LIVE From Ohio State Reformatory
April 24, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Growing Up Psychic with Chip Coffey
April 17, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Residual Haunts or Paranormal Time Reflections?
April 13, 2012


The Union Screaming House with Steven LaChance
April 10, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

LIVE from the Phenomenology Conference in Gettysburg
April 3, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Bide One's Time: Life After Death? By Debra Prosser
March 31, 2012

Column - regular feature

Time Travel with Von Braschler
March 27, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Extraterrestrial Contact with Stan Romanek
March 20, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Hauntings at Fado: Irish Pubs, Ghosts, and Weird Chicago
March 16, 2012


Getting Psychic with John Holland
March 13, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

SPIRICOM with Thomas Pratt of MetaScience
February 28, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Farewell, Grant Wilson
February 24, 2012


Alien Abductions
February 21, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

The Rise and Fall of the Nephilim with Scott Roberts
February 14, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Induced After Death Therapy: An Interview With April Slaughter
February 2, 2012


The Ghosts of Ohio with John Kachuba
January 31, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Pendulum Dowsing Study
January 25, 2012


Ghost Research: Science or Spiritual? With Dustin Pari
January 24, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Paranormal Pastoring: Part 2 by Reverend Sherrie James
January 11, 2012


The Patterson Bigfoot Film with Jeff Hilling
January 10, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast

Your Ghost Encounters
January 3, 2012

30 Odd Minutes - webcast



May 18, 2012

Guidelines to Presenting Paranormal Evidence


By Nick Ferra of Virginia Paranormal Society

This is an inside look at presenting your paranormal evidence to the public and your clients. As you read this you will find out why this was written and why it's time investigators should really start documenting their investigations instead of just walking around blindly in the dark asking questions to the air.

Careful evidence analyses could really help the investigator debunk possible paranormal evidence before posting it to the public. This type of care in our approach helps bring credibility to your team and the larger field. Of course, this article may not be the final word on presenting what you believe to be paranormal evidence but I really believe that this is a first step in the right direction.

False Positives


With all due respect, I think the whole idea behind the phrase, "If you were not there then you don't know what happened" during a paranormal investigation is nonsense. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to know how dust illuminates in photos or how false anomalies are created by the many different camera settings. This is pretty much saying that if other people were not there to witness the photo being taken or the evp being recorded that people are not allowed to give their analysis of the potential piece of evidence. If that's the case then this suggests that anyone can claim anything they have as evidence of a haunting and that it must be considered a ghost/spirit or something paranormal because they they were there and you weren't. This line of thinking is insane.

Nick Ferra
Unfortunately, these days a lot of teams and people who call themselves paranormal investigators do not study anything about camera settings or how false anomalies show up in their photos. They also do not study up on how false EVP are created just by simply shuffling their feet and scratching their forehead they may hear what might sound like a voice saying "get out of my house" (example) all because they shuffled their feet and scratched their forehead. These are the people who will ban and delete comments on social media sites made by other people who try to give a reasonable and natural explanation of what is being called evidence of the paranormal. They might even go as far as calling you a bully because you offered a logical explanation and they did not want you to disagree with them.

A "Word" Or Two


People are going into homes and haunted locations and blindly walking around in the dark not documenting anything on their "thrill seeking event." Instead they are just waving around a meter with green, yellow and red lights and saying they are communicating with spirits. Flashlight experiments are being conducted by unscrewing the bottom of the device to where it is barely touching the battery and they think they are communicating with spirits when the light turns off and on. They are listening to radio scan different radio stations thinking they are picking up the voices of spirits and yet we are not allowed to offer a reasonable explanation to what they call evidence of a haunting because we were not there? Do you see what I'm getting at?

Another unfortunate truth is the "word" of an investigator these days means nothing to anyone anymore. What people don't realize is that you need documentation and proof of the events that happen during the investigation. Just posting one single photo and saying this is a ghost doesn't cut it anymore. You need more documentation if you are going to present something to the paranormal field as evidence of a haunting. For those who claim an expert photographer or a professional audio engineer claimed they couldn't explain your piece of evidence also needs documentation. Just saying an expert looked at your piece of evidence and couldn't explain it does not mean anything as well. Your "word" means absolutely nothing!

So anyway, what kind of documentation are we talking about?

Equipment


First things first though -- and this is a word of advice to anyone reading this: stop wasting money on K2 meters, ghost boxes, ovilus, EMF meters (except for the Natural Tri Field meter) and start saving up the money to purchase video and video accessories.

Camcorders, IR cameras, DVR systems, good quality video cables, extra batteries for your camcorders - these are the things you need to invest your money in first. If you are going to investigate the paranormal then you need all the video equipment you can get. The previous meters and gimmicks need to be deleted out of your mind an off of your wish list. They are worthless and a waste of money. On a side note: EMF detectors can be used for debunking purposes but that is another story for another time.

Audio: Save up the money for some good quality audio equipment that records in a WAV format. Anything other than WAV (such as mp3, wma etc) are lossy formats and have the potential to create foreign sounds or misinterpret sounds and voices being recorded.

So why all the video and audio equipment plus accessories? Without the documentation of video the "word" of an investigator means nothing. I believe video is one of the most important tools on an investigation and people need to realize that if you post a photo and expect a full analysis of it and proof that it is a spirit then you need more documentation that one single photo. Same goes for audio clips that you think might have EVP in them.

Basic Guidelines For Evidence Presentation


Below is a basic guide that I believe should be going around to get people started on posting your evidence online and to your clients:

Photo evidence
- include make and model of camera being used
- present at least 3-4 photographs of the same angle of the photograph in question for comparison reasons. This helps eliminate the possibility that the photo in question could be something natural in the photo.
- include the EXIF data for each individual digital photo
- include the negatives for the photo's if using film. Whatever is in the photo will be on the negative. This will help prove that the photo is not faked.
- present video backup of the person taking the photo of at least 10-15 seconds prior and 10-15 seconds afterward.
- present video documentation of where you are at.
- present video documentation of the full 360 degree angle of the area you are taking the photos
- provide or blueprint of the area showing where everyone was located during the time the photo was taken. ( If you have video recording then you will have an accurate account of where everyone is at. This will help if someone near you might be casting a shadow of themselves.)
- log equipment everyone is using. (This will help document if someone is using a piece of equipment that could have a reflective surface. Also will help if any IR shadowing might appear or if anyone has a flashlight on and causing a disruption in the photograph.)

EVP
- include make and model of audio devices being used
- provideideo documentation of 30 seconds before the evp and 30 seconds afterward
- provide udio documentation of 30 seconds before the evp and 30 seconds afterward
- provide ideo documentation of everyone in the room/area during the entire time. (This will help eliminate possible contamination of movement, whispering that went untagged and so on.)
- log what equipment everyone is holding and using that could produce foreign sounds
- include at least 1-2 other recordings of the same incident from other audio recording devices and their make and model. One can ould use audio from video cameras as well.
- Include a spectral analysis to determine the Hz of the evp in question

Video
- include make and model of all video cameras being used
- provide video documentation of 30 seconds before the event in question and 30 seconds afterward
- provideideo documentation of the area you are investigating and it's surroundings
- provide ideo documentation of where yourself and other investigators/clients are at
- include at least 1-2 other video clips of a different view from other video cameras

Present all this in a video using your windows movie maker (usually every computer will have this free software already installed), PowerPoint, or an equivalent Mac software (if that is what you have) and upload it for free on You Tube (you can specify specific privacy settings if you don't want it to be publicly viewable) and it will make for a great presentation of your evidence.

These are just a few examples of how the paranormal field needs to change it's perspective on posting potential evidence. Think it's too much work? You won't think it's too much work if you want to be taken seriously and to present something worth looking into. All this will help eliminate the possibility of human contamination and equipment malfunction. One must eliminate all natural possibilities in order to come closer to finding possible evidence of the paranormal. Of course this isn't the final word on how to present good potential evidence of the paranormal but it is a start and will help others in the field with a better analysis of what you might have.

Overall, "being there or not" to witness the investigation has nothing to do with anything. Having the phrase of "You weren't there so you are not allowed to question what others have caught" is complete nonsense.

So many teams and people overlook many simple things when it comes to their potential evidence they post. Investigators and investigation teams should welcome the views of everyone and listen to those who have been in the field for a while.

If you want your piece of potential evidence to be authentic SO BAD then you MUST provide more documentation than one lousy photo or a 5 second audio or video clip. Just your word alone is not going to cut it anymore. A full report (just like you did in high school science class) MUST be volunteered with the evidence you caught in order for it to be taken serious. Remember forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments, researching and forming a conclusion in your science classes? Well unfortunately stuff like this needs to be done in the paranormal field. Walking around in the dark waving a flashy meter around and talking to the air just isn't enough anymore. It is time for a change and it needed to change yesterday.


Nick Ferra, founder of the Virginia Paranormal Society, located in the New River Valley, has been in search for the truth regarding paranormal activity for over 10 years now. If you had asked him 10 years ago that he would be doing this type of thing he would of laughed and rolled his eyes. It only took a small interest in the field and one investigation with a local team to trigger an even bigger interest into the unknown that goes way beyond just a simple hobby. Since then Nick has been on several cases with his team and joined up with other local and out-of-state teams to look for the truth.




2014 Haunted New England Wall Calendar by Jeff Belanger photography by Frank Grace
Check out the 2014 Haunted New England wall calendar by Jeff Belanger and photography by Frank Grace!


Paranormal Conferences and Lectures
Don't miss the following events and lectures:

Jeff Belanger and “The Bridgewater Triangle” at Dedham Community Theatre - April 6, 2014 9:00PM

The Spirits of the Mark Twain House - Hartford, Connecticut - April 12, 2014

Paracon Australia - East Maitland, New South Wales, Australia - May 10-12, 2014